Clarity, Confidence, & Creativity: New Information On The Science of Dealing With Stress, People, & Life!
The origin of this new information is rooted in the new developments in brain science. For example, most people know that our brains are divided into three parts: the brainstem, the limbic system, and the neocortex.
This means that as we move through the day, data comes in from our five senses, and is first examined (scanned) by the limbic system. If the limbic system determines that the information is not problematic or threatening, or dangerous, it sends it up to our neocortex. In this case, our brainstem works in the background, regulating our breathing, blood pressure, heart rate, etc., and all is well.
However, if the limbic system senses any problem, anything, or anyone that it doesn’t like or has identified as a stressor or a threat to either our physical wellbeing or psychological peace of mind, it sends the information immediately down to the brainstem, bypassing the neocortex!
Unfortunately, when we try to deal with the perceived problem from this lower, reactive brain, we are often less than successful, which, of course, has us feeling even more stressed, frustrated, and ineffective. The limbic system interprets this additional frustration as even more negative data, and dutifully sends it right back down to the brainstem, creating a self-perpetuating cycle.
In my books, presentations, and coaching sessions, I give participants a model for making this shift, a second model for staying in this “Top of the Mind” perspective, regardless of the situation, and a third for engaging others (who are themselves stuck in the brainstem) in such a way that they shift from their “resistant brain” to the more “receptive brain,” which allows them to hear our suggestions as valuable information.
All of these models are described in depth in my book, “Life from the Top of the Mind,” and I teach these models to those in my seminars and training sessions. However, there is one tool that you can use to get at least a sense of what this “Top of the Mind” perspective is like. The effectiveness of this tool lies in the power of questions.
You see, when we are talking about engaging very specific parts of the brain, questions are like “Google on steroids” in the sense that they become the “search engine of the brain.” Unfortunately, when we are stressed and/or frustrated, we tend to ask what I call “BS” or “brainstem questions,” which are questions about the perceived stressor. Examples include:
- “What’s wrong with these people?”
- “What were you thinking?”
- “Why does this always happen to me?”
- “How many times have I told you . . .?”
Regardless of the specifics, questions such as these engage the lower 20% of the brain, and as such, are a big part of the problem.
Therefore, to address this problem, I have created an alternative set of neocortex questions (questions that can only be asked and answered by the upper 80% of the brain) that I call “The Four Criteria.” The value of these interrogatories is that they allow us to not only evaluate any reactive response, but to also identify a “Top of the Mind” alternative.
These Four Criteria, or neocortex questions are:
1. Has this thought, emotion, or action been chosen deliberately, or on purpose? Most people would say that they don’t choose to be stressed or frustrated on purpose, it just seems to happen to them.
2. How is it working for me? Meaning, to what degree do I feel that my stress, frustration, resentment, etc., is helping me become more effective and/or encouraging to others to hear what we have to say? Again, most people would not identify these reactions as highly effective or desirable.
3. Is this thought, emotion, or action making the statement I want to make about who I am? This question goes way beyond just avoiding the problem, and speaks to the fact that everything we do makes a statement about who we are and who we are becoming. Just as most people would say that they are not becoming stressed, annoyed, and/or frustrated on purpose, most would also say that these would not be the words they would choose to define who they are (“I am someone who is reactive, frustrated, stressed, annoyed, etc.”)
When we say that the challenges we face “make us” feel or do one thing or another (“Deadlines make me nervous.” “Difficult people make me angry,” etc.) then what we are really saying is that the negative situations and people in our lives have the power to define us!
Given that we do not want to be defined by the negative aspects of life, I believe we must take personal responsibility for this process, and define ourselves on purpose.
As mentioned, the first step in this process is to determine what part of the brain we are coming from, and evaluate whether our current thoughts, emotions, and/or actions are ones we want to feed or change. The first three questions of “The Four Criteria” can go a long way toward making this determination because, as discussed, they are “neocortex questions,” and thus engage the upper 80% of our brain in the process of evaluation. However, the fourth question is one that many people report being even more powerful than the first three combined. It says:
4. Would I teach this thought, emotion, or action to my child, my children or to someone I love?
When I get to this point in my seminars and ask this question, a knowing silence always falls over the participants. The reason for this is that no one would purposefully teach his or her children (or anyone they care for) to be stressed, frustrated, depressed, or confused on purpose. Thus, this question completes the initial evaluation of our thoughts and emotions in a very powerful way.
Having asked and answered these questions, we are now in the position to use the Four Criteria to come up with a solution, meaning that we can now ask: “Okay, if I was choosing my thoughts, emotions, and actions on purpose…in a way that I believe would be most effective…in a way that makes the statement I want to make about who I am…and in a way I would teach/recommend to someone I love,”… what would that look like? How would I be thinking, feeling, and acting differently if this were the case?
Once we have this new vision of what we want to practice (versus just what we want to avoid) we are then in a position to use the rest of the “Life from the Top of the Mind System” to not only access our clarity, confidence, and creativity, but to bring these qualities to all aspects of our lives.
Of course, all of this is easier said than done, and that’s why I give those I work with a complete system for accessing the clear, confident, creative part of the brain, regardless of the situation. I then teach them how to stay in the “Top of the Mind,” and how to deal with difficult people in such a way that they shift from their resistant brain to their receptive brain so that they truly hear and understand what you want them to know. If you feel you and or your organization would benefit in learning this system, please feel free to contact me so that we can discuss this further.